billingsgazette.com

Appeals Court reverses 1997 wolf ruling by Wyoming federal judge

DENVER (AP) - An appeals court ruled Thursday that hundreds of transplanted Canadian wolves can remain in the northern Rockies, a decision that environmentalists hailed as a boon for species recovery efforts nationwide.


Associated Press photo
An appeals court says Canadian wolves, like this one released in Yellowstone National Park, can stay in the Northern Rockies.


The 10th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals reversed a 2-year-old decision by a Wyoming federal judge who ruled that a government wolf reintroduction program in Yellowstone National Park and central Idaho was illegal.

The appeals court rejected arguments by officials with state and federal farm bureaus that the program's rules violated the Endangered Species Act.

Opponents of the reintroduction program said its rules deprived naturally occurring gray wolves in the recovery areas of their endangered-species protections by treating them the same as reintroduced wolves.

Environmental groups that joined Interior Secretary Bruce Babbitt and other government agencies in the appeal of the Wyoming ruling said the new decision sets an important precedent.

"The practical effect is that the wolves are here to stay," said Mark Van Putten, president of the National Wildlife Federation, adding that the decision has "enormous significance nationwide."

The court's endorsement of a flexible approach to the goals of the Endangered Species Act is "a strong boost for similar commonsense, pragmatic approaches to other species and other places," he said.

Babbitt, whose agency ordered the wolf program and was sued over it by the American Farm Bureau Federation and state chapters in Wyoming, Montana and Idaho, called the decision "a ringing endorsement to our wolf reintroduction program."

Rodger Schlickeisen, president of Defenders of Wildlife, said the ruling marks "a new day for wolves in more ways than one."

"The Yellowstone wolves have been given a new lease on life and so has the principle that science - not politics - should guide wildlife restoration efforts in America," he said.

Jon Robinett, whose ranch in Dubois, Wyo., about 40 miles from Yellowstone has been hit by repeated wolf attacks on livestock, was disappointed with the ruling.

"I just don't think they paid close enough attention to what was presented to them," he said. "Maybe they weren't well-versed in the Endangered Species Act."

Idaho Farm Bureau spokesman Dan Goicoechea had not seen the ruling yet. "If it's true, we're disappointed," he said. "It's never been a deal with doing away with wolves. It had to do with the federal government following the law as it was written."

Jake Cummins, executive director of the Montana Farm Bureau, agreed. "I believe the consequences of such a ruling are significant for all of us. That means that Congress can no longer limit the intent of the law by the language of their legislation."

The appeals court reversed the December 1997 ruling by U.S. District Judge William Downes, who had sided with the farm bureaus. They had argued that the program endangered the naturally occurring wolves because its rules allow ranchers to shoot individual wolves that attack their livestock.

Downes had ordered the reintroduced wolves removed, but had stayed his own ruling pending the decision by the federal appeals court.

In Thursday's ruling, the court said the 1973 Endangered Species Act and a section added by Congress in 1982 were intended to allow the Interior Department flexibility in its approaches to the goals of preserving and recovering threatened animals.

It said the argument that the rules of the reintroduction illegally deny full protections to naturally occurring wolves unnecessarily limits that flexibility, "ignores biological reality and misconstrues the larger purpose of the Endangered Species Act."

Such a "restrictive interpretation (of the law) could actually undermine the department's ability to address biological reality, and thus handicap its ability to effectuate species recovery," it said. "The Endangered Species Act simply does not countenance that result."

Van Putten said there is a thriving population of about 300 wolves in Yellowstone and central Idaho as a result of the reintroduction program, which began in 1995.

Copyright 2000 Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Ruling vindicates wolf plan, Park Service, wildlife service say

By MICHAEL MILSTEIN
Gazette Wyoming Bureau

Top officials in the National Park Service and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service said Thursday's court ruling vindicates the 550-page environmental impact statement that took more than a year to compile and drew more than 140,000 public comments before it set wolf recovery into motion.

"That wolf EIS and record of decision has faced its last known challenge and it's been bulletproof," said John Varley, head of the Yellowstone Center for Resources, Yellowstone Park's resource management branch. "That's a real credit to the agencies involved and the people out there who were willing to forge an acceptable plan."

By laying the groundwork for a wolf recovery plan that allowed ranchers to shoot any wolves attacking their livestock, the EIS reflected broad public support for the return of wolves to the Northern Rockies without overlooking the interests of local residents, said Ed Bangs, the document's lead author and head of the federal wolf recovery program.

"A lot of things that people told us they wanted if they were going to live with wolves we've been able to give them and those things have worked," Bangs said. "We tried to reach a reasonable compromise for everybody and still stay within the bounds of the Endangered Species Act and I think we accomplished that."

A total of 116 wolves, including nine reproducing packs, now roam the Yellowstone region. The recovery plan spelled out in the EIS requires 10 breeding pairs of wolves to reproduce three years in a row in each of three areas - Yellowstone, Central Idaho and northwest Montana - before wolves can be removed from the federal list of endangered species.

About 140 wolves now roam Idaho, while numbers of wolves in Montana lag behind at about 60.

With a few exceptions, most wolves have remained largely on public lands, have reproduced faster and have killed fewer livestock than the EIS predicted they would. Bangs remains disappointed state wildlife agencies have not taken a greater role in wolf monitoring and management, but said he hopes this week's court decision will make them more comfortable with assuming such a role.

Updated: Friday, January 14, 2000
Copyright © The Billings Gazette, a division of Lee Enterprises.